Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alia

You lost me. I can't figure out what you are gettting at.

Under Clinton, there was LESS spending for social welfare. Bush is spending more--as a % of total spending--for social welfare than Clinton did.

Bush is spending so much money on handouts both here and to foreign nations that major military weapon programs are in jeopardy, and many have already been scaled back, delayed, or canceled.

Compared to Bush, Scumbag was a fiscal conservative.


159 posted on 01/23/2006 9:00:32 AM PST by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (Bush's #1 priority Africa. #2 priority appease Fox and Mexico . . . USA priority #64.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]


To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
Under Clinton, there was LESS spending for social welfare

You really believe that. And you've separated out the WOT funds, first, right?

293 posted on 01/24/2006 4:36:46 AM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson