[csense]

...He's also an idiot

[Lurker]

Wow, now there was a cogent comprehensive criticism.

L

[MineralMan]

"...He's also an idiot"

No, actually he is not an idiot. The different creation stories are well-known and much discussed among theologians.

Probably a majority of Christians believe that the creation story is non-literal. Other Christians believe it is a literal account.

Both groups, however, accept Jesus as their savior. That's why they're Christians. The question of whether the first couple of chapters of Genesis are literal or story-telling makes no difference, really.

[I see my hands]

"he's also an idiot"

Who are the others?

[SuzyQue]

So how do you explain Genesis? I'm really curious - why do you attack someone who grapples with the apparent contradiction in Genesis. How do you handle the two different versions of Creation?

[truth_seeker]

"...He's also an idiot"

Wow. Powerful logic. I'm convinced.

We need you on our debate team.