Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwalsh07

1. My post was not addressed to you.

2. That you are trying to pick a fight over the political aspects suggests irrationality on your part or an inability to comprehend what you've read.

I wrote: "I don't agree with the politics of the website..." What part of this statement is unclear? Note that this is a rhetorical question.


394 posted on 01/25/2006 2:08:01 PM PST by peyton randolph (As long is it does me no harm, I don't care if one worships Elmer Fudd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies ]


To: peyton randolph
My post was not addressed to you.

Yeah, so?

And now that you've blessed me with an address, what exactly on that site do you think is worthwhile reading?

You can't get past the first three paragraphs without blatant balogna assaulting ones senses.

395 posted on 01/25/2006 2:11:14 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson