Ok. Fair enough. You only believe researchers who you agree with. I'm sure you believe it fair that I do the same.
Have a nice afternoon.
False. You haven't listened to a thing I've said. I'll believe anyone who presents convincing physical evidence. The ICR "scientists" have none that supports their point of view. Not a sausage. No successful predictions that run counter to accepted mainstream geology. No mineral finds. Zilch. Nada. Zip. Nothing.
Look at it this way. Supposing that the Bible didn't exist, but that a group of scientists (lets call them the Institute for Critical Research) said that there was a global flood a few-thousand years ago in which almost every creature and plant in the world died. What are the 5 best pieces of physical evidence that support that view, that the ICR in such circumstances would bring forward? And what are their answers to the copious geological/paleontological/physical/hydrological/genetic evidence that no such event occurred? No creationist ever answers those questions, and the reason is that flood geology is predicated entirely on Biblical authority, and zero on physical evidence for it.
Why aren't these ICR guys monopolising all the mineral finds? After all if they are right then their understanding of geological processes is far better than everyone elses. The oil companies should employ them, and they could use the billions that they would raise to support their ministry. Such successes would bring Nobel Prizes and global recognition, fame, and fulsome apologies from the 99% of geologists who've rejected flood geology. Don't hold your breath....
You have a nice afternoon too.