Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Polybius
I think the key phrase may be "individually identifiable". As long as the names aren't given, it should be legal.
115 posted on 01/21/2006 6:07:54 PM PST by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]


To: inquest
I think the key phrase may be "individually identifiable". As long as the names aren't given, it should be legal.

Let's assume that you are the multi-million dollar Orlando Regional Healthcare System Inc and that I am a former "flesh-eating bacteria" patient.

Let's further assume that I'm a greedy SOB.

If you release my medical information with my name crossed out, how long do you think it will take before my blood-sucking lawyer is claiming that there was enough information on that record to individually identify me as a "flesh-eating bacteria" patient thereby violating my HIPAA civil rights and causing me untold embarrassment, nightmares, nervous incapacitation, loss of libido, , etc., etc., etc.?

She already has a lawyer so filing a lawsuit is just a little bit more paperwork.

Once a lawsuit is filed, any release of information during discovery is by Court order so the corporation can no longer be held liable for release of that information.

The corporation is specifically asking to be sued with one lawsuit to avoid several additional potential lawsuits and the wrath of the HIPAA Police.

121 posted on 01/21/2006 6:40:50 PM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson