Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Marie

If younger people are against abortion, seems to me the issue is solved, right? I'm a Boomer, and we're mostly not having babies any more, so if the younger generation is against abortion, presumably they're not having them.


26 posted on 01/21/2006 10:09:43 AM PST by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: linda_22003
This does apear to be the case.

First: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/03facts/pregbirths.htm

(snip)

"From 1990 to 1999, there was a 9-percent decline in the birth rate (from 70.9 to 64.4 births per 1,000 women aged 15-44) and a 22-percent drop in the abortion rate (27.4 to 21.4), with an overall 12 percent decline in the pregnancy rate from 115.6 to 102.1. These trends and other findings are outlined in a new report issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which updates and revises pregnancy rates from 1990 to 1999 to include the latest abortion data for 1999."

And second: http://www.leanleft.com/archives/2003/10/31/1820/

(snip)

"Pregnancies fell 7 percent, from 6.78 million in 1990 to 6.28 million in 1999. The birth rate declined 9 percent in that time, from 70.9 to 64.4 births per 1,000 women ages 15 to 44. And the abortion rate went down 22 percent, from 27.4 to 21.4 abortions per 1,000 women."

And, if there were some way we could take New York out of the equation, the picture would be even more dramatic. I cannot *believe* that city aborts 40% of their babies! Insanity.

33 posted on 01/21/2006 10:21:35 AM PST by Marie (Support the Troops. Slap a hippy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson