Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: supercat

I think you're right. Some work has been done on that (but not enough).

For example, my Hybrid Escape has what Ford calls an Atkinson cycle engine. It's not really that at all; what they've done is retard the timing of the intake valve to reduce pumping loss on the compression stroke (some of the mixture flows back into the intake runners).

Also, the throttle is fly-by-wire. You can't do things like rev the engine unnecessarily when the transaxle is in park. You can't power brake either, but then this isn't a performance car either.


105 posted on 01/20/2006 5:45:06 PM PST by Doohickey (If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice...I will choose freewill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: Doohickey
For example, my Hybrid Escape has what Ford calls an Atkinson cycle engine. It's not really that at all; what they've done is retard the timing of the intake valve to reduce pumping loss on the compression stroke (some of the mixture flows back into the intake runners).

Probably the delayed intake closure to which I was referring. It may be that doing that reduces throttle energy waste to the point that there's not much worth harvesting, but otherwise as I said the throttle, if harnessed, would represent better-than-free energy.

110 posted on 01/20/2006 7:58:08 PM PST by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson