Posted on 01/20/2006 9:56:51 AM PST by NormsRevenge
WASHINGTON - A growing number of Republican voters are frustrated by congressional spending and scandal, according to GOP leaders from across the country who worry that an "enthusiasm deficit" could cost the party control of Congress in November.
Some rank-and-file Republicans wonder what happened to the party that promised to reform Washington after taking control of Congress in 1994 for the first time in 40 years.
"We've seen the enemy, and he is us," said Tom Rath, a Republican National Committee member from New Hampshire describing the sentiments of some GOP voters. "We have to get back to the basics. Let's talk about small government and reduced spending, and don't let the Democrats take those issues."
"I hear a lot of concern about increased spending and the need to reduce it — talk about getting back to the basics," said Kate Obenshain Griffin, chairwoman of the Virginia Republican Party.
Griffin, Rath and several other Republican activists attending a two-day RNC meeting said GOP voters in their states still strongly support President Bush. They also insisted in interviews that Republicans were more likely than not to retain control of the House and the Senate in November.
But the possibility of losing Congress doesn't seem as remote as it once did. Many tried-and-true Republican voters are disenchanted with party leaders in Congress, and the sulky mood could suppress turnout in November, RNC members said.
Separately, private polling for Republicans suggest that government spending and political fallout from the Iraq war are causing anxiety among GOP voters. Senior party officials inside and outside the White House fear that Washington scandal may hurt GOP turnout if average Republican voters believe that Congress' spending habits are partly the result of corruption.
That may be one reason why national party chairman Ken Mehlman told RNC members that corrupt politicians in either party should be rooted out and punished. "The public trust is more important than party," he said in a speech Friday.
The investigation of lobbyist Jack Abramoff threatens to ensnare at least a half dozen members of Congress of both parties and Bush administration officials. Abramoff, who has admitted to conspiring to defraud his Indian tribe clients, has pleaded guilty to corruption-related charges and is cooperating with prosecutors. His ties to GOP congressional leaders and the White House pose a particular problem for Republicans.
Ten months before the midterm elections, Bush gets a chance to shape the political landscape with his State of the Union address Jan. 31. But there are a few clouds on the horizon that concern Republicans:
• A debate over immigration reform in Congress that threatens to divide the pro-business wing of the party from the anti-immigration conservatives.
• A May 15 deadline to sign up for a Bush-backed Medicare prescription drug program that has angered senior citizens, a formidable voting bloc in November.
• Revised budget deficit estimates are expected soon from the Congressional Budget Office and the White House. Bush will urge Congress to increase the $1.8 trillion debt limit in the next few weeks. These are all reminders that Republican-led Washington is awash in red ink.
Republican voters want their leaders to use control of Congress and the White House to implement a conservative agenda, and not get sidetracked by politics or scandal in Washington, RNC members said.
"There is frustration when people see internal struggles here in Washington and they don't see us get anything done on immigration and don't see us get anything done on the deficit," said DeMarus Carlson, an RNC member from Nebraska.
Party leaders fear that while conservative voters may become disengaged, liberal voters will be galvanized by their opposition to the Iraq war and their frustration with minority-party status.
"I talk about an enthusiasm deficit, and I think we have a little bit of that," Rath said of Republican voters. "They say we need to get our act together. They still love this president. But they want to see movement on the things that brought us to power. We took the government over and promised to fix things."
Outside the RNC, party strategists expressed the same concerns about voter turnout in November.
"They do love the president, but they have seen a Congress that doesn't seem to function well and they wonder what the heck is going on," said consultant Joe Gaylord, who helped Republicans seize control of the House in 1994 as an adviser to then-Rep. Newt Gingrich, R-Ga.
"Whether it's an inability to communicate accurately or an unwillingness to solve the problems they were put in power to fix, people are confused," Gaylord said, "and that confusion could lead people to stay home in November."
___
On the Net:
Republican National Committee: http://www.rnc.org
Haven't seem much of Ron's work lately.
Probably working on some new spin.
fyi
Be afraid, be very afraid.
We're actually upset with where spending is done, not how much. As for scandals, I'm sick of the Repubs' neutered leadership buckling like a belt every time the DemonRats manufacture a scandal. And Bush's illegal immigrant amnesty schemes are killing his popularity.
When I get fund raising letters from anything GOP these days I fill out their little polls and whatever else they ask for. But when they get to the part about money I simply insert a little note that says-" Seal our borders and stop spending money like drunken Democrats and I'll send you some money".
That may be one reason why national party chairman Ken Mehlman told RNC members that corrupt politicians in either party should be rooted out and punished. "The public trust is more important than party," he said in a speech Friday.
Sounds good to me............
Is there any way for the legislature to cut out pork projects from spending bills on a line-by-line basis? These people are making $200K+ per annum, and they're out living the fat life and not spending as much time in session as they should. I propose they actually work and go through each of the bills they have to consider and have the strength of the party confront those who wish to laden spending bills with worthless pork using OUR tax dollars.
Last time I checked, those who make that much money per year have to work pretty hard to get to the top of the mountain. Now it's more about who has the most charisma, money to run a campaign and a law degree more than anything else. Bring back the old days of politicking!
This is a false dichotomy. You can be pro-business and anti-illegal immigration at the same time. I think they really mean pro-businesses-that-use-illegal-labor.
thx, jla. :)
We need to purge the system of the self-serving professional politico mediocrity and replace him with what the founders had in mind: the citizen-politician.
Sowell has some interesting things to say about this. ("Cheap Politicians")
They should be afraid.
"As you know, I've been an active republican supporter for many years now but there comes a time when one comes to the end of his patience. I'm sick and tired of hearing wait until next year from our elected represenatives! When I see those folks ACTUALLY MOVING legislation important to me and, according to all the polling data I've seen, millions of others across the country I will be open to opening my check book again but that is what it's going to take! Excuses are not going cut it any more!"
I meant every word I said to him.
The GOP shouldn't be worried about the "Party Faithful"-- they should be worried about the "conservative faithful". And there's more of us.
Iraq? Borders and spending I can understand, but not Iraq. Why, I could even see frustration over the fact that the energy policy hasn't been passed, but not Iraq.
How about if they just start doing what's right instead of playing footsies to placate the Dims? Far too many of them are RINOs and think that we actually want them to play nice with the idjits on the Left.
They damn well better be worried about the Party faithful BUMP!
if the dems can find a way to turn the two biggies (immigration/fiscal resp.)against us we've had it
thats why i wrote my congressman urging him to support shadegg for leader. i feel like he can put us back on the right track
"The GOP shouldn't be worried about the "Party Faithful"-- they should be worried about the "conservative faithful". And there's more of us."
Conservatives will be faithful to the party when the party is faithful to us. Show me the next Ronald Reagan.
If all they plan to do is talk about these things, fuggidaboudit. We want action, and we want representatives who will walk on broken glass to get the results we need.
1) Seal the borders - before anything eles - NOW
2) Actually shrink government (and stop shifting the burden to State governments with unfunded mandates)
3) Return to full support of Israel
4) Elect conservative leadership in the House & the Senate, not RINOs
5) To the RNC & the WH - Support conservative candidates, not RINOs
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.