Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pharmboy

I recall that Kant said the same thing more than 200 years ago.


36 posted on 01/20/2006 8:10:09 AM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RobbyS

Well, Kant said that there were three dimensions of space, and that that was all there could be, since it was clearly the case that there couldn't be any others.

Special Relativity blew a hole in that. General Relativity nailed the coffin shut. Quantum Field Theory and String Theory are currently dancing on the grave.


39 posted on 01/20/2006 8:16:06 AM PST by Netheron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: RobbyS; Pharmboy; Alamo-Girl
From National Academy Press

In fact, many believed that Euclid’s was the only geometry that the human mind was capable of knowing. Immanuel Kant, the influential eighteenth-century philosopher, taught that Euclidean geometry was ordained to be true by the very structure of the human intellect; space could not even be conceived to be otherwise. Therefore, Kant concluded, Euclidean geometry was an example of synthetic a priori knowledge—it was a truth about the world that could be known to be true without doing any experiments.

Kant, of course, was all wet, but many people believed him anyway Carl Friedrich Gauss, however, saw through Kant’s overconfidence.

Gauss, the greatest mathematician since Newton, realized that geometry could, logically, be construed in a way different from Euclid’s. Unfortunately Gauss was a perfectionist, who was therefore reticent about publishing...

More discussion:
On Gauss' Mountains and
Riemann for Anti-Dummies Part 47

78 posted on 01/22/2006 7:28:05 PM PST by Virginia-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson