Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Clinton Talks Tough on Iran but Hasn't Explained Why...
Worldwide Standard ^ | 19 JANUARY 2006 | Daniel McKivergan

Posted on 01/20/2006 3:01:48 AM PST by rdb3

Sen. Clinton Talks Tough on Iran but Hasn't Explained Why the Clinton-Gore Administration Helped Arm Iran with "Highly Threatening Military" Equipment and Technology

Presidential aspirant Hillary Clinton has some tough words on preventing Iran from getting nukes.

"We cannot take any option off the table in sending a clear message to the current leadership of Iran that they will not be permitted to acquire nuclear weapons," she said. "In order to prevent that from occurring, we must have more support vigorously and publicly expressed by China and Russia, and we must move as quickly as feasible for sanctions in the United Nations."

The Russia the Senator refers to would be the same one Al Gore cut a deal with that emboldened "sales of missile and nuclear technology to Iran" and, if you believe Zbigniew Brzezinski and James Schlesinger, the sale "of highly threatening military equipment such as modern submarines, fighter planes, and wake-homing torpedoes." Both Carter administration officials signed this letter in October 2000:

Statement by Former Secretaries of State, Defense, Directors of Central Intelligence and National Security Advisors on the Sale of Russian Weapons to Iran, October 24, 2000

The following individuals, who include supporters of both Governor George W. Bush and Vice President Gore, believe strongly that:

``The President's most important job is safeguarding our nation's security and our ability to protect our interests, our citizens and our allies and friends. The military balance in regions of vital interest to America and her allies--including the Persian Gulf, which is a critical source of the world's energy supplies--is the essential underpinning for a strong foreign policy.

``This is why we are deeply disturbed by the agreement made between Vice President Gore and then Russian Premier Chernomyrdin in which America acquiesced in the sale by Russia to Iran of highly threatening military equipment such as modern submarines, fighter planes, and wake-homing torpedoes.

``We also find incomprehensible that this agreement was not fully disclosed even to those committees of Congress charged with receiving highly classified briefings--apparently at the request of the Russian Premier. But agreement to this request is even more disturbing since the Russian sales could have brought about sanctions against Russia in accordance with a 1992 U.S. law sponsored by Senator John McCain and then Senator Al Gore.''

George P. Shultz, former Secretary of State.
James A. Baker, III, former Secretary of State.
Zbigniew Brzezinski, former Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs.
Frank C. Carlucci, former Secretary of Defense and former Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs.
Lawrence S. Eagleburger, former Secretary of State.
Henry A. Kissinger, former Secretary of State and former Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs.
Donald H. Rumsfeld, former Secretary of Defense.
James R. Schlesinger, former Secretary of Defense and former Director of Central Intelligence.
Brent Scowcroft, former Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs.
Caspar W. Weinberger, former Secretary of Defense.
R. James Woolsey, Attorney and former Director of Central Intelligence.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 109th; hillary; hillaryclinton; iran; irsn

1 posted on 01/20/2006 3:01:52 AM PST by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rdb3

Sen. Clinton Talks Tough on Iran but Hasn't Explained Why...



she knows what her husband supplied them with


2 posted on 01/20/2006 3:04:32 AM PST by sure_fine (*not one to over kill the thought process*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sure_fine
Whenever the Beast talks tough, look for her to either vote for, or have already supported the opposite position.

She's more of a flip flopper than sKerry.

I hope she gets to DemonRat nod in 2008. Theres so much ammo on her already that we won't even need all the new stupid stuff she's bound to say.

The GOP just needs to run a REAL conservative with a clean record.

3 posted on 01/20/2006 3:45:57 AM PST by libs_kma (USA: The land of the Free....Because of the Brave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Another question for the Queen of the plantation ....


What is her position regarding the Chinese Military NOW having the ability to drop accurate multiple headed nuclear weapons on the US and Europe thanks mostly to their generous contributions to the Clinton - Gore Administration.
4 posted on 01/20/2006 3:59:21 AM PST by IrishMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike
I think that it is very funny that she attacks the Bush Adm. for not using diplomacy against Saddam. That they relegated our European allies to a backseat and made th eUN look foolish.
Now she is mad because we used diplomacy, moved our European allies to the for-front of the negotiations and want to get the UN involved. She said that we outsourced our diplomacy.
Is she just insane? Does she realize that we can look back at what she said a few months ago?
5 posted on 01/20/2006 6:12:40 AM PST by Holicheese (Sold my house in MA. Another Yankee moving to NC!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Hildabeast can't really say what's on her mind....bubble head can't go there without letting her liberal ways expose her ultimate goal.
...she's starting to try to sound presidential, by trying to stay "central"she hears it from her far left....if anyone thinks she actually supports the war on terror...wait, her true colors will surface soon.
6 posted on 01/20/2006 6:14:09 AM PST by Doogle (USAF...8thAF...4077th TFW...408th MMS...Ubon Thailand..."69"..Night Line Delivery,AMMO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Sen. Clinton Talks Tough on Iran but Hasn't Explained Why...

..She's waiting for Iranian Governmental "Campaign contributions"..like the ChiCOMs (Charlie Trie/John Huang..bags of $$$$) did. :))

7 posted on 01/20/2006 6:55:23 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass

She talked tough on Iraq as well then turned 180 and started bashing the administration just like the rest of the dem's.

She knows the press never bring up her past and she will get a media free pass.


8 posted on 01/20/2006 6:56:30 AM PST by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: edcoil
She knows the press never bring up her past and she will get a media free pass.....Democratic Party = LMSM
9 posted on 01/20/2006 7:01:55 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

It seems to me that the voters who care one way or the other would be intelligent enough to realize that Hillary should be attacking her own party over the Iran situation and not the Bush administration .... assuming that in the first place she was: 1) serious and 2) a slightly more competent leader than the last two stinkers who tried to defeat Bush for the Dems.


10 posted on 01/20/2006 9:48:53 AM PST by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dr_who_2

Explanation? 'We' do not give explanations...


11 posted on 01/20/2006 9:51:23 AM PST by COBOL2Java (Freedom isn't free, but the men and women of the military will pay most of your share)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

Because she doesn't have to. She has the MSM in her pocket.


12 posted on 01/20/2006 9:52:26 AM PST by conservative barking moonbat (1997 Light years from home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson