Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fragrant abuse
Because he hadn't just invaded Iraq to install a Shia-dominated government.

We invaded Iraq to destroy its WMDs. We never invaded in order to bring democracy, least of all a democracy that puts Shia Islamists allied with Iran in charge of the heart of the Arab world.

Treader wanted a solution to the problem, I gave him one. It's an ugly solution, but only because we've allowed it to become an ugly problem. If Patton had gone on to Russia, we could have avoided the Cold War and the threat of MAD. Despite the rhetoric, the reality is that we're settling in for a long Cold War with Iran that could have been avoided, too.
125 posted on 01/20/2006 10:04:35 AM PST by Lejes Rimul (I was right about Iraq all along. Told you so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]


To: Lejes Rimul

Ultimately, this war is about democracy and whether or not it can take root in Iraq, and the Middle East. Why did we do invade? To remove the threat of WMD attacks and to install a democratic regime. Because democracies don't attack other democracies and terror-producing radicalism is defused by an open political system.

Obviously Dick Cheney, Rummy and the President must have been aware that if they installed a democracy in Iraq, it would become Shia-dominated and likely to come under Iran's influence. I think they expected the insurgency to be less intense and prolonged, and that we would have more troops available to deal with Iran.

We are in a tricky situation, and there are lots of variables. I'm not sure how the endgame will play out. Military action against Iran is not off the table. Airstrikes would delay their nuclear program, and the situation in Iraq can improve.

Ultimately, we and the Israelis would have to ask ourselves, can we live with a nuclear-armed Iran? Would the Mullahs be willing to sacrifice their regime and millions of Iranian lives in exchange for the destruction of Israel, or an attack on the United States?

Would using a terrorist outfit as a proxy protect them? I doubt it. There are ways to tell who made what. We would take them out, regardless.

Ahmadinejad seems like a dangerous fanatic, but I'm not sure if he would be willing to turn all of Iran into a suicide bomb. But a nuclear-armed Iran as a regional superpower would be a disaster for us all.


126 posted on 01/20/2006 11:37:45 AM PST by fragrant abuse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson