To: jneesy
What "book" is that? How about the 40 million plus unborn children killed since Roe v. Wade - that's not just slightly more important?
To: clawrence3
"How about the 40 million plus unborn children killed since Roe v. Wade - that's not just slightly more important?"
Reversing Roe V Wade tomorrow won't stop abortions. What it would do is make some states abortion states, other states non-abortion states, and the rest at some point in between. This is doable now, while the other takes time and starts with getting like-minded people on the SCOTUS. We -can- work on more than one thing at a time, you know.
The fact remains, this is important. In fact, this is as vital to our national security as any defense bill passed in the last 20 years. If we don't start securing our borders and ports, we may as well surrender publicly to Osama and hope for the best.
11 posted on
01/19/2006 5:33:05 PM PST by
NJ_gent
(Modernman should not have been banned.)
To: clawrence3; jneesy
How about the 40 million plus unborn children killed since Roe v. Wade - that's not just slightly more important? What about them? They are gone. Reversing Roe v. Wade won't bring them back. Yet, the illegals are still here breaking laws and stealing U.S. sovereignty day by day. You want them to be pardoned or granted amnesty. This is what you advocate?
A proud American would stand up for his sovereignty not give it away to a third-world horde.
21 posted on
01/19/2006 6:02:41 PM PST by
raybbr
(ANWR is a barren, frozen wasteland - like the mind of a democrat!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson