Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jec41

Or maybe I should have said that cauliflower is yucky--that is as irrelevant as any of it. God IS who IS. He is not in the past nor the future, thus time, it would seem, is of no consequence to God. It IS of consequence to Men.


332 posted on 01/20/2006 8:24:08 AM PST by jcb8199
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]


To: jcb8199
Or maybe I should have said that cauliflower is yucky--that is as irrelevant as any of it. God IS who IS. He is not in the past nor the future, thus time, it would seem, is of no consequence to God. It IS of consequence to Men.

God IS who IS or Is not. There are six philosophical logical deducted and argued ontological proofs both for and against the existence of God. All argument either for or against have been refuted. Therefore what what God is or is not resides in the mind and is the thought and concept of the individual. Such thoughts and concepts can all be proved or refuted thought the philosophical method of reasoning and logical deduction. All such thoughts and concepts will remain only a argument until empirical evidence is discovered or presented. However that time is of consequence to Men is incorrect. It may be of consequence to some Men but not all. It would be of consequence to those men who invented it, defined it, and use it as a tool to determine consequences. However there are primitive tribes that exist on islands off of Indonesia that have no thought or concept of time. There is no measurement of time, any use of time and for them time does not exist. Time is of no consequence to those men.
345 posted on 01/20/2006 9:35:28 AM PST by jec41 (Screaming Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson