Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran threatens oil crisis in nuclear standoff
AFP on Yahoo ^ | 1/19/06 | AFP

Posted on 01/19/2006 1:22:20 PM PST by NormsRevenge

TEHRAN (AFP) - Iran warned of a world oil crisis if sanctions are imposed over its nuclear program even as the United States and Europe struggled to get support for UN Security Council action.

"In case of sanctions, other countries will suffer as well as Iran," Oil Minister Davoud Danesh-Jafari said, according to the official news agency, IRNA.

"One of the consequences will be the unleashing of a crisis in the oil sector and particularly a price hike."

Iran, the number two oil exporter in OPEC with oil revenue last year of 42 billion dollars, risks being referred to the United Nations Security Council over what the West suspects is a covert nuclear weapons drive.

World oil prices this week hit a near-four-month high in New York, partly on fears of Iran sanctions.

The nuclear standoff came to a head when Iran broke international seals last week to restart uranium enrichment research which had been suspended for two years under deals with the Europeans.

But the United States and Europe are facing resistance, particularly from permanent UN Security Council members China and Russia, to their push for a referral to the world body and possible sanctions.

"We have been very clear that we believe the time has come for a referral of Iran to the Security Council," US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said in Washington.

Rice said Iran had been given adequate opportunities to resolve the nuclear issue through negotiations and prove to the world that it was not seeking nuclear weapons.

Russia, which is Iran's main partner in the growing civil nuclear program, has been trying to steer away from a UN showdown. China has also opposed such a step.

Britain, France and Germany, backed by the United States, have called for an emergency meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on February 2, a first step before possible UN Security Council referral.

Iran insists it is not seeking to build nuclear weapons and that it has the right to develop atomic energy. It has threatened to suspend snap inspections by the IAEA if it is brought before the Security Council.

But the Western powers have rejected Iran's call for a return to direct talks, Britain describing it as "vacuous," unless there is a return to the fuel cycle suspension.

French Foreign Minister Philippe Douste-Blazy met with resistance when he held talks in Moscow with his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov to get support for UN action.

"We must simultaneously be united but also firm, to tell the Iranians to return to reason, to stop these dangerous nuclear activities and to let us negotiate together," Douste-Blazy told reporters after the talks.

But Lavrov reiterated Russia's attempts to strike a less confrontational stance.

"We need to act exactly as in medicine," he told journalists. "First understand what method is the most effective -- the scalpel or therapy. Only then do you understand all the aftereffects of further steps. Only then should you act."

As the world powers appeared split, Iran secured backing from Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, who pledged support for Iran's nuclear program and rejected pressure on Tehran.

"We expressed our support for Iran in its pursuit of peaceful nuclear technology and we back the idea of a dialogue with international parties," Assad said after talks with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

"We also reject the pressure being exerted on this country" over its nuclear program, he said.

A US senator said he planned to introduce a bill calling on President George W. Bush's administration to press governments around the world to shun Iran over its nuclear program.

Democratic Senator Evan Bayh, speaking on US television, said he plans to introduce his resolution Friday, calling for Iran to be excluded from international forums and events and asking the administration to urge other governments to sever economic relations with Tehran.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: gwot; iran; irannukes; nuclear; oilcrisis; standoff; threatens
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Syrian President Bashar al-Assad(R) and his Iranian counterpart Mahmoud Ahmadinejad give a joint press conference in Damascus. Assad pledged support for Iran's nuclear program and rejected pressure on Tehran.(AFP/Louai Beshara)


1 posted on 01/19/2006 1:22:22 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Good. Then maybe we can start drilling ANWAR.


2 posted on 01/19/2006 1:23:04 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

We should invade that country, take the oil fields and dump our garbage there for the next 1000 years. And no nation building this time.


3 posted on 01/19/2006 1:29:11 PM PST by samadams2000 (Remember our Founding Fathers were REAL men- Unlike today's Rinos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: samadams2000
We should invade that country, take the oil fields and dump our garbage there for the next 1000 years. And no nation building this time.

I'm with you. Bush keeps being accused of war for oil; he should actually do it to show them what it looks like.

4 posted on 01/19/2006 1:34:13 PM PST by trebb ("I am the way... no one comes to the Father, but by me..." - Jesus in John 14:6 (RSV))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: samadams2000

You have my vote for President. Excellent idea.


5 posted on 01/19/2006 1:34:28 PM PST by laotzu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

How do I know Ahmadinejad has Herpes? Just check out Assad's lip. Someone has going to bat in more than a figurative manner on someone else...


6 posted on 01/19/2006 1:34:50 PM PST by steel_resolve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I'd gladly pay more for gas if it meant Iran couldn't use nuclear weapons against us or Israel.


7 posted on 01/19/2006 1:35:23 PM PST by agooga (So, there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

They sure look friendly, don't they?


8 posted on 01/19/2006 1:36:41 PM PST by loreldan (Lincoln, Reagan, & G. W. Bush - the cure for Democrat lunacy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Two peas in a pod.


9 posted on 01/19/2006 1:38:39 PM PST by paulcissa (Only YOU can prevent liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I'd like to smoke a Hellfire missile right down between those two!


10 posted on 01/19/2006 1:39:54 PM PST by Travis McGee (--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

I hear ya, talk about an excellent target and 2 for the price of one.


11 posted on 01/19/2006 1:41:30 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The should remember that the word 'embargo' is American for STARVE


12 posted on 01/19/2006 1:43:25 PM PST by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocket ship underpants don't help...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samadams2000

I like that... make it a big, 'transfer-station'.


13 posted on 01/19/2006 1:45:04 PM PST by johnny7 (“Iuventus stultorum magister”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

so, they make threats with oil?

And it will get better when they have a nuke?


14 posted on 01/19/2006 1:45:24 PM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Yeah, when that Jacka$$ Iranian says to move Israel to Europe, I say move the paleostinians to Iran.


15 posted on 01/19/2006 1:51:19 PM PST by blasater1960 ( Ishmaelites...Still a wild-ass of a people....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The face of Evil sits on the left (weird coincidence...)


16 posted on 01/19/2006 2:05:36 PM PST by jcb8199
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Just where is Ahmadinejad's left hand? Could it explain the smile on Assad's face?


17 posted on 01/19/2006 2:08:37 PM PST by Tokra (I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

My exact thought!

I'll walk, ride a bike or work from my home before I give into these terrorists.


18 posted on 01/19/2006 2:12:15 PM PST by not2worry (What goes around comes around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

And just how much oil do we actually get from the P@#cks?

I understand its ZERO.


19 posted on 01/19/2006 2:13:58 PM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agooga

That's very sensible.


20 posted on 01/19/2006 2:41:45 PM PST by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson