"As we recited earlier, the Government did not, and does not, contend that the findings are clearly erroneous."
Of course, you could always go post the relevant sections of the government's briefs, and just blow me right out of the water by making a prima facie case of your own, showing where they presented said evidence before. But you won't do that, because it isn't there. So instead you'll just pull your same stupid routine of beating some minor point to death. Go play with yourself now - I'm done here. You can have the last word, which I have no doubt you will use to declare victory.
When did the 3rd hold evidentiary hearings?
[crickets]
Fox News just had their "Legal Consultant" Craig Mitnick on, live, explaining the Google situation.
He calmly, rationally, soooooooooothingly, explained how the Internet is like a global roadway, and, just like on the road, you should need a license, and everywhere you go, your license is on display, you should likewise be required to be "tagged" to be on the Internet "roadway", so that the "police" can see where you are, and who you are.
He explained how it was only reasonable to require the travels of everyone to be tracked, logged, stored, so that if they are found in a bad location, the police can pull them over and ask what they're doing.
Senator Bedfellow wrote, in an attempt to explain the above to mojave:
Of course, you could always go post the relevant sections of the government's briefs, and just blow me right out of the water --
-- But you won't do that, because it isn't there.
-- So instead you'll just pull your same stupid routine of beating some minor point to death.
Mojave is, in a way, the Craig Mitnick of FR.
He has a mission, -- to explain how it is only reasonable to require that everyone bow to the wiil of the majority..