[TigersEye]

And yet another poster weighs in without reading the article.

There is nothing, not one thing, not a single solitary reference or intention to reference KIDDIE PORN in this article or in what the gooberment is doing here!

[trisham]

Fortunately, I had already read this:

In court papers that the San Jose Mercury News reported on after seeing them Wednesday, the Bush administration depicts the information as vital in its effort to restore online child protection laws that have been struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court. Yahoo Inc., which runs the Internet's second-most used search engine behind Google, confirmed Thursday that it had complied with a similar government subpoena.

So I was aware of the connection prior to this thread. However, I do appreciate your good manners.

http://articles.news.aol.com/business/article.adp?id=20060119120609990032&cid=