[UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide]

"What a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his own home or office, is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection." --Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 353 (1967).

Non-sequitur. I didn't suggest that anyone but Google has a direct interest in the data. At the same time, Google is not "the public".

[HiTech RedNeck]

The dweeb seems to think that if Google may sell it, Google must divulge it to the government. No, that is totally Google's call to make.