Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Feds Seek Google Records in Porn Probe
AP Via Yahoo ^ | 2006-01-19

Posted on 01/19/2006 10:36:33 AM PST by flashbunny

The Bush administration, seeking to revive an online pornography law struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court, has subpoenaed Google Inc. for details on what its users have been looking for through its popular search engine.

Google has refused to comply with the subpoena, issued last year, for a broad range of material from its databases, including a request for 1 million random Web addresses and records of all Google searches from any one-week period, lawyers for the U.S. Justice Department said in papers filed Wednesday in federal court in San Jose.

Privacy advocates have been increasingly scrutinizing Google's practices as the company expands its offerings to include e-mail, driving directions, photo-sharing, instant messaging and Web journals.

Although Google pledges to protect personal information, the company's privacy policy says it complies with legal and government requests. Google also has no stated guidelines on how long it keeps data, leading critics to warn that retention is potentially forever given cheap storage costs.

The government contends it needs the data to determine how often pornography shows up in online searches as part of an effort to revive an Internet child protection law that was struck down two years ago by the U.S. Supreme Court on free-speech grounds.

The 1998 Child Online Protection Act would have required adults to use access codes or other ways of registering before they could see objectionable material online, and it would have punished violators with fines up to $50,000 or jail time. The high court ruled that technology such as filtering software may better protect children.

The matter is now before a federal court in Pennsylvania, and the government wants the Google data to help argue that the law is more effective than software in protecting children from porn.

The Mountain View-based company told The San Jose Mercury News that it opposes releasing the information because it would violate the privacy rights of its users and would reveal company trade secrets.

Nicole Wong, an associate general counsel for Google, said the company will fight the government's efforts "vigorously."

"Google is not a party to this lawsuit, and the demand for the information is overreaching," Wong said.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: americantaliban; bigbrother; google; govwatch; libertarians; nannystate; porn; snooping; statist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 681-700701-720721-740741-746 last
To: Mighty Eighth

OK, whatever you say.


741 posted on 01/24/2006 8:34:30 AM PST by dinoparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 738 | View Replies]

To: Mighty Eighth
An adult's looking at adult ANYTHING is none of the gummint's *&%$^&&$%^&*_()&%$ business.

Perv porn purveyers and pedophile predators are.

742 posted on 01/24/2006 5:45:12 PM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 735 | View Replies]

To: Mighty Eighth
You sound like Hitlery

You sound like a NAMBLA recruiter.

743 posted on 01/24/2006 5:46:35 PM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 737 | View Replies]

Comment #744 Removed by Moderator

To: Mighty Eighth
We're not talking about kiddie porn.

The law also protects children from online exposure of their personal and contact information. NAMBLA members must hate that.

745 posted on 01/27/2006 6:43:41 AM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 744 | View Replies]

To: Mighty Eighth; Mojave
Mighty Eighth:
An adult's looking at adult ANYTHING is none of the gummint's *&%$^&&$%^&*_()&%$ business.

Mojave:
Perv porn purveyers and pedophile predators are.
You sound like a NAMBLA recruiter.

THIS ISSUIE IS ABOUT LEGAL ADULT PORN. The government has no business SNOOPING on law-abiding citizens, capisce?
Next it'll be all those who do searches on "Rifles", "Guns", or "Second Amendment".
Are you really that OBTUSE???????
744

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Eighth, - our boy is far from obtuse. -- He wants gov prohibitions on all sorts of 'evil' objects like guns.. -- To him, prohibitions are just the democratic 'will of the majority' in action..

746 posted on 01/27/2006 8:39:42 AM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 744 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 681-700701-720721-740741-746 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson