Replies

I believe everyone is misunderstanding my point. I do not want to take everyone out to smokehouse and kill them. No way. How could you even get that with my posts especially since my parents are boomers. What I mean is that when it gets to the point that their is no way for survival and people are wanting to keep the person on all those tubes for sentalmental reasons that is the only time I am talking about. Please don't distort my standing like you are writing for the MSM. That goes for all of you liberals out there. FREEPERS was always so conservative, but this posting has made me realize that their are many trolls on here.

I will gladly weigh my conservative credentials against yours nOOb, any time.

No way for survival? Why don't you wait and see? What is the rush to starve to death someone who is showing signs of improvement?

Should we do away with ICUs, figuring that anyone hurt that bad can't recover?

What about ventilators for people with pneumonia? They can't even breathe on their own.

After all, all that stuff is expensive.

What I got from your posts is that it is all about the money. Hang the fact that the child might be a material witness to attempted murder (her own), and maybe some of those who would pin that on the accused have a motive for wanting the girl dead.

I quote you : Food and water would be fine, but we are talking an exteme amount of money to keep them alive. I am pro-life as far as abortion, but Euthanasia is a totally different thing. Do you realize how expensive this could be when the Baby Boomer start demanding to stay alive with no chance of a normal life. It shutters me to think that this would destroy the economy.

Just who do you think built the d@mned economy in the first place? The same people (baby boomers)who are shelling out good money for extended care policies at their insurers today.

That child is no 'baby boomer', just a kid who got the crap beaten out of her, apparently on a regular basis.

Do you think she deserved that? She is not some stray puppy to be kicked and put down.

As for liberal, no, the liberals would kill her in a heartbeat, because they have no compunction about slaughtering innocent children before, during, or, in this case, after birth, and money has always been one of the first excuses they use to deprive people of fundamental rights.

Maybe you should reexamine what you think.

I believe everyone is misunderstanding my point.

I don't think so.

I do not want to take everyone out to smokehouse and kill them. No way.

I kinda figured you make some exceptions.

How could you even get that with my posts especially since my parents are boomers.

What does you being the heir of boomers have to do with anything? The fact that Michael Schiavo said it felt good to starve and dehydrate his parents to death is no reflection on you. When you talked about wanting to off the boomers, I didn't think you were talking about your parents. I figured they were among the exceptions you'd make. But who knows. Maybe you're more like Michael than I thought.

What I mean is that when it gets to the point that their is no way for survival and people are wanting to keep the person on all those tubes for sentalmental reasons that is the only time I am talking about.

So you only want to eliminate Lebensunwertes Leben? You were not talking about allowing a dying person to die. You were talking about murdering a little girl because you didn't want tax money being spent on her care and feeding. Your ethics are very familiar.

Please don't distort my standing like you are writing for the MSM. That goes for all of you liberals out there. FREEPERS was always so conservative, but this posting has made me realize that their are many trolls on here.

You seem to be very confused about the meanings of Conservative, Freeper, trolls, and life. May I suggest you read what our Founder has to say on the subject?

"What I mean is that when it gets to the point that their is no way for survival and people are wanting to keep the person on all those tubes for sentalmental reasons that is the only time I am talking about"

Hold on, Junior. If that's all you meant, then why didn't you come out and say so from the start. You could have expressed it as above, instead of advocating offing the boomers if their lives aren't normal, just to save some bucks for the economy (#47) - and expecting us to know that's what you meant by it. If that's what you really meant.

Nah, who am I kidding. A person's first take on a subject usually reveals how he feels about it deep down in his heart and soul. And you've revealed a soul that craves genocide for profit.

Either that, or you're so incoherent that you can't express what you mean the first time, and instead express it as something entirely different.

Either one of those, or you're trying to backtrack and deny having said what you did, and you're too slow witted (or cocky) to realize that everything you've said on this thread is still there for anyone to read.

Remember that self defense I mentioned would come from the entire generation you proposed to eliminate for profit? Will that self defense take the form of words only? Think.