My point had nothing to do with the child. Don't know where you received that wrong information from...
Your point had everything to do with killing Hailegh, based solely upon economics, as evidenced by your comments in post #40:
"No because we are not talking about people who are just sick. We are talking about people who are pretty comotose. There is a big difference. You can pay for the care I don't care, but I don't particularly want too. It should be up to the families. I am surprised that you would want a bigger government paying for this."
Facts you should be aware of:
"...We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed...
Securing the right to "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" is our government's job. As Hailegh has been denied these rights, it is the role of government to step in and correct the injustice done to her.