Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: clawrence3
I speak English (although I do speak fluent Spanish as well) and comprehend every word you posted. What you are not comprehending is the fact that children of illegals born in the U.S. are American CITIZENS and that we should not be tearing apart such families. As for "OBL-speak" I don't think I've ever heard of the United States Constitution, 14th Amendment specifically, referred to as "OBL-speak" - next argument?

See, that "Anchor-baby" provision is because of a deliberate misinterperetation of the law as written.

Illegals that are Illegally in the US are not under US Law, as they are not here legally. Therefore any children they have are not US Citizens.

But even if that still continues, my answer is so frickin what?!

Send the parents back...let the kid either go with them, or be adopted here...but the ILLEGALS must go!

No exceptions!

Too harsh? Tough. The parents never should have been here to put the kid in that situation!

65 posted on 01/19/2006 11:47:16 AM PST by Itzlzha ("The avalanche has already started...it is too late for the pebbles to vote")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: Itzlzha

If those were the only choices, then I guess I would have to go with adoption - that's sad though you can be so harsh.


72 posted on 01/19/2006 11:54:56 AM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson