Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lugsoul
Wiretaps were.

Your words above. Please note, the NSA issue does not involve a wiretap. You need to brush-up on the technology. FISA needs to brush-up on the technology. Congress needs to brush-up on the technology.

Current NSA "monitoring" techniques do not require the use of a wiretap. In a technological sense, the NSA is eavesdropping on selective telecommunications.

Now, review the laws and show me even one that has determined the Federal Government requires a warrant to "eavesdrop".

48 posted on 01/19/2006 12:08:08 PM PST by been_lurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: been_lurking
Now, review the laws and show me even one that has determined the Federal Government requires a warrant to "eavesdrop".

Now there's a GREAT argument for making the NSA/FISA brou-ha-ha disappear.

/ rolls eyes /

51 posted on 01/19/2006 12:33:07 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: been_lurking
Perhaps you should review the laws. The use of the word 'wiretap' was generic and, admittedly, loose. What is governed by FISA is 'electronic surveillance.' Go take a look at FISA and see if you think you can carve data mining or Echelon or whatever out from the scope of the definition of 'electronic surveillance.'

I hope you didn't take a look at the law before you urged me to go read it. If you did, that'd be pretty sad.

54 posted on 01/19/2006 12:42:14 PM PST by lugsoul ("Try not to be sad." - Laura Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson