[Rudder]

But you generally smell where you breathe (or taste).

But, I am not in this article, it's about a primitive fish and there's nothing in the article about that fish's manner of olfaction. Yet you said (But our ears could smell--until we evolved. That's according to the peers who pitch their wares here--) there was and used that false statement to criticize the article.

It would seem you're more motivated to hurl false claims that to honestly debate the substance.

[Mamzelle]

This article is whimsy and speculation. Caprice. A joyride of possibilities. Maybe it's how it happened--who can deny a maybe?--but the really great thing about evo-"science" is that you can present all these fruitings of the imagination and no one is going to hold your feet to the fire. This is unaccountable, whereas if you feed a person a bad medicine, the results are immediate and unmistakable.

A scientist is as good or bad as any other person--this is the basic assertion I make. They can discover a great medicine--or they can feed you hokum and jeer at you when you doubt them.