Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: denydenydeny
I can well understand why Grover al-Norquist might have a problem with this, and it has nothing to do with being a "conservative."

I can well understand how real conservatives would have a problem with the executive branch performing warrantless searches. It's against the spirit of the constitution, and it puts us in danger if and when Hillary is in the White House.

40 posted on 01/18/2006 8:51:03 AM PST by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: churchillbuff

I hope that you "well understand" that if these terrorists are not caught that you and we will suffer even more 9/11s. Waiting for the courts to issue a warrant will close the window for getting the information from their phone calls. The President took an oath to protect this country. He is doing just that. Instead of quibbling, you should be thanking him for living up to his oath.


46 posted on 01/18/2006 8:56:17 AM PST by Carolinamom (New member of Sam's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff

The key word in the Constitution is "Unreasonable Searches".

Such protections were never intended for enemy combatants or their agents operating in the US.


52 posted on 01/18/2006 8:59:36 AM PST by Wristpin ("The Yankees have decided to buy every player in Baseball....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson