Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: inquest

Unless you've got something substantive to add to the topic, I'm out of here.


370 posted on 01/24/2006 3:18:32 PM PST by Boot Hill ("...and Joshua went unto him and said: art thou for us, or for our adversaries?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies ]


To: Boot Hill
I don't care if you consider this "substantive" or not, but there's no legal justification for your concluding that the President's powers of foreign surveillance are any more sacred under the "Separation of Powers doctrine" than his powers of domestic law enforcement.

I tried several times to get you to address that point, but you sidestepped it or equivocated each time. That itself speaks volumes.

371 posted on 01/24/2006 4:50:17 PM PST by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson