Skip to comments.
A Swift-Moving Story (Murtha Alert)
WashPost ^
| 1/18/06
| Howard Kurtz
Posted on 01/18/2006 7:25:19 AM PST by pissant
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
The liberal-traitor crowd is steaming over the conservatives shining light on Jack "George Galloway wannabee" Murtha's Kerry-esque past. I Love it.
1
posted on
01/18/2006 7:25:20 AM PST
by
pissant
To: pissant
Murthat has an ass full of rice, too?
2
posted on
01/18/2006 7:27:02 AM PST
by
NRA1995
(GOOOOOOO STEELERS!!!)
To: pissant
Murtha and John Kerry should be tried for treason. The entire Democrat Party is nothing but a bunch of traitors.
To: pissant
"What, exactly, does whatever Murtha did near Danang in 1967 have to do with the soundness of his stance on Iraq?"
You see, that's the problem here. Murhta's stance is *not* sound, but it is being propped up by his record as a warrior. If his record is a sham, the prop is destroyed, letting the country get back to some level of reality.
4
posted on
01/18/2006 7:31:05 AM PST
by
Frank_Discussion
(May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
To: pissant
Typical lib crap.....start out on the track of the headline, branch out into some other incoherent rambling, and never finish the thought and/or article...
5
posted on
01/18/2006 7:33:25 AM PST
by
joe fonebone
(Woodstock defined the current crop of libs, but who cleaned up the mess they left?)
To: pissant
The irony is that until the left starting bleeting like sheep, I had no idea this story was out there.
To: pissant
you could argue that the Swift Boat Vets -- even though the media poked significant holes in their account WTF? Did they get JFnK to sign the SF-180 or something?
7
posted on
01/18/2006 7:34:02 AM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islam Factoid:After forcing young girls to watch his men execute their fathers, Muhammad raped them.)
To: pissant
Okay, the moral lepers are frothing about challenges to their attempts to increase Murtha's credibility by calling him a "highly decorated veteran." No surprises there.
But where is the factual information?
Slut Magazine said the records are available, but I though Murtha was pulling a Kerry on that.
8
posted on
01/18/2006 7:34:22 AM PST
by
dsc
To: Frank_Discussion
I always thaought the Swift Boat vets were unfairly "Swiftboated", Together they had thousands of years of service, CMOH's, Retired Admirals, the works. The media smeared them.
9
posted on
01/18/2006 7:34:34 AM PST
by
Wristpin
("The Yankees have decided to buy every player in Baseball....")
To: E. Pluribus Unum
"WTF? Did they get JFnK to sign the SF-180 or something?"
No, they just babbled some crap, and will forever after claim to have "poked significant holes" in the truth.
10
posted on
01/18/2006 7:36:16 AM PST
by
dsc
To: pissant
--even though the media poked significant holes in their account -- Pure BS. The media and Kerry never refuted anything that the SBVFT put forth. This is further MSM disinformation.
11
posted on
01/18/2006 7:38:40 AM PST
by
kabar
To: pissant
What, exactly, does whatever Murtha did near Danang in 1967 have to do with the soundness of his stance on Iraq?
Ah, the old distract and destroy leftist illogic tactic. The left has lifted Murtha on their shoulders and proclaimed him to be a gen-you-wine war hero.
However, when their gen-you-wine war hero repeatedly demands that we cut and run as he did in Somalia and more recently with Iraq, one is within the boundaries of sanity by questioning what it is that makes Murtha such a gen-you-wine war hero.
If we examine the record of another gen-you-wine war hero such as Audie Murphy, we would have to ask the question what would he think about our operations in Somalia and Iraq and would he join with Murtha in calling for our immediate retreat and capitulation, or would he want us to finish what Saddam started?
As usual, the WaPo is practicing the usual leftist tactic of appearing to address the issue head-on by distracting the reader from the topic to attack the counter-argument. The problem for the WaPo is that the counter-argument, as it typically does when we are talking leftist positions, has merit; and they can't distract their way out of it.
12
posted on
01/18/2006 7:42:39 AM PST
by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
To: Wristpin
13
posted on
01/18/2006 7:46:52 AM PST
by
Frank_Discussion
(May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
To: pissant
A Cybercast News Service investigation also reveals that one of Murtha's former Democratic congressional colleagues and a fellow decorated Vietnam veteran, Don Bailey of Pennsylvania, alleges that Murtha admitted during an emotional conversation on the floor of the U.S. House in the early 1980s that he did not deserve his Purple Hearts. ..from the article, do take note, it was a fellow DEMOCRAT that exposed his kerry like medal awards in question. Another one of these "no military records indicate" stories. And of course Murtha won't release his military records
Doogle
14
posted on
01/18/2006 7:47:15 AM PST
by
Doogle
(USAF...8thAF...4077th TFW...408th MMS...Ubon Thailand..."69"..Night Line Delivery,AMMO)
To: Frank_Discussion
That is a great point. His whole reason for being propelled into the limelight is that he is a highly decorated Marine Vet from vietnam. This gives him standing as an "expert".
15
posted on
01/18/2006 7:50:02 AM PST
by
Holicheese
(Errrr ahhhhhh My dog Splash got into my Chivas)
To: kabar
Agreed. I never saw a significant hole punched in the stories of the Swift Boaters. As far as I am concerned they helped save America.
To: dsc
Fox News Sunday, Juan Williams says that all the time, "The discredited Swift Boaters". I always ask, how were they discredited. JFK had to admit he was not in Cambodia, that his stories do not jibe and that Nixon never sent him to Cambodia at Christmas.
17
posted on
01/18/2006 7:56:19 AM PST
by
Holicheese
(Errrr ahhhhhh My dog Splash got into my Chivas)
To: pissant
What, exactly, does whatever Murtha did near Danang in 1967 have to do with the soundness of his stance on Iraq? Incredibly disingenuous.
They know very well that it's precisely Murtha's war record that's being used to shield him and the Democrats from the charge of defeatism.
18
posted on
01/18/2006 7:59:08 AM PST
by
denydenydeny
("As a Muslim of course I am a terrorist"--Sheikh Omar Brooks, quoted in the London Times 8/7/05)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
>> ... even though the media poked significant holes
>> in their account
> WTF? Did they get JFnK to sign the SF-180 or something?
JfK signed the 180, but only for his pals at the Boston
Globe, not so that the general public could examine the
key records.
Murtha, like Kerry, could make all this go away (or
get very much worse) by signing the 180.
Kerry didn't, and Murtha won't either.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson