Skip to comments.
(Chief Justice) Roberts Questions McCain-Feingold Limits
Las Vegas Sun ^
| 17 Jan 06
| Frederick Frommer
Posted on 01/17/2006 4:38:09 PM PST by xzins
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 last
To: xzins
Interesting predicament: Paul Clement is from Wisconsin, and arguably agrees with WRL's position, but yet has to argue against them.
61
posted on
01/18/2006 7:15:36 AM PST
by
July 4th
(A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
To: xzins
It could be that the Pres might have thought that IF if were unconstitutional that Scotus would kill it.But doesn't that imply that he was violating his oath? To uphold and protect the consitution.....and signing something that he believes isn't means he didn't do that.
To: joesbucks
Not necessarily...after all he's a businessman, not a lawyer.
63
posted on
01/18/2006 8:03:12 AM PST
by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
To: xzins
I think this is the first piece of crappy precedent to be thrown out the window once Alito is making the call. Might as well get started. Also, let me just say how happy I am that Roberts seems to be more rock solid every day.
64
posted on
01/18/2006 10:55:40 AM PST
by
Clump
To: jeltz25
"RATS" court?
I've got your number, troll.
65
posted on
01/21/2006 7:29:30 PM PST
by
JCEccles
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson