Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv
Louis Leakey (the old, dead guy) caught hell for talking about greater antiquity than the (at that time) dogma of 3000 years (IOW, the blind belief back then was that humans had entered the Americas no more than 3000 years ago). This was before Clovis entered the picture. He based that on the number of major civs found around the two continents, the number of language families, etc. Since that time, Clovis-First-and-Only replaced the 3000 year limit.

You might want to research this one a little more. I think the western US had radiocarbon dates far older than 3,000 years at the time Leakey made his pronouncements.

24 posted on 01/17/2006 8:50:09 PM PST by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman

Perhaps you're right, but I don't think so. Radiocarbon dating (that began post WWII) is what got Clovis dates accepted; Leakey's visit was circa 1930.


25 posted on 01/17/2006 8:59:18 PM PST by SunkenCiv (In the long run, there is only the short run.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson