Let me make it as simple as possible for you (although one who has read judicial opinions in 'light of a legal education' should have had no problem with the question the first time)
From post #31 the poster makes the statement..
There is no "Republican" interpretation of the Constitution. Many hold a literal view. Some hold an expansionist view. But both Roberts and Alito hold the literalist view. If you don't see that from their decisions that are a matter of record, you are not paying attention.My question stands. Brown and Thomas are not in the same camp of Roberts or Alito. Brown and Thomas have (more than once I might add) stated in their opinions the concern of the federal government overstepping the rights of the separate and sovereign states. Brown is even on record in a speech as dissenting against the incorporation theory of the 14th Amendment. Considering the stance of Roberts and Alito on more than a few cases (reading their opinions with my 'limited' mind apparently), how can one say those four are in the same camp?* Two of them are true originalists (for the most part) and two are stalwart Republican judges.Janice Rogers Brown is in the same camp. Justice Thomas is not "the only one on the court."
*I've emboldened my question so it doesn't slip by as a jellyfish this time...
It looks like you won't be getting an answer. That's too bad; I was interested in seeing it.