Pretty much what I expected; based on the facts that came out about this course, it became apparent it was a sham enterprise giving token acknowledgement to the evidence for Evolution whilst ladling on the religiously-based alternatives and anti-Evo hysteria, as promoted by 19 some videos produced by religious organizations, as thick as possible.
This confirms my previous sentiment that the Dover case will, in time, be seen as ID's "Waterloo." Judge Jones ripped asunder the camouflage behind which ID had been hiding, and shined the bright light of truth on it. In that light, ID was seen for what it really is, a iintellectually bankrupt shell intended as a battering ram to sneak particular religious views into the science class room while trying to evade the current jurisprudence that clearly holds that teaching Creationism in public schools is constitutionally impermissible.
How about if they want to teach the Bible as it relates to history, art, geography? Would that be constitutional?