LOL. If wheat was more important than a TV, then why doesn't it cost more? The fact that the TV is made up of multiple components is irrelevent, because you said that wheat was more important than a TV(which includes all of those componenets). So, since you think wheat is more important than a TV, why won't you trade me your TV for a bushel of wheat? Clearly, you think the TV is more important.
Second, why limit it to a bushel? You once again are not able to draw a true comparison exposing yourself as disingenous.
Lastly, I suppose a super-capitalist will think he can actually feed his children with a computer instead of a bushel or more of wheat, since it is more valuable.