Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Condi Says She’s Not Running. Believe It this time.
RealClearPolitics.com ^ | 01/17/2006 | Jay Cost

Posted on 01/17/2006 7:26:57 AM PST by SirLinksalot

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 461 next last
To: warchild9; Wolfstar

Please spare us from another clownish run by the clueless Mr. Keyes. The likelihood of him winning ANY office is on a par with the likelihood of Osama bin Laden converting to Chirstianity and donating his fortune to the families of the 9/11 victims. His last campaign was such a joke, that his Democratic opponent basically abandoned his own campaign as unnecessary, and took to running around the country doing fundraising appearances for other Democrats.

In between his out-of-the-blue attack on Dick Cheney's gay daughter, and his own teenage daughter's public announcement that she is "a liberal queer", Alan treated us to an explanation of why gays shouldn't be allowed to adopt children -- because the children wouldn't know who their parents are and might inadvertently end up committing incest. Poor Alan, distracted by his Fred-Phelpsian obsession with all things homosexual, forgot that children who are adopted by married heterosexuals also rarely know who their biological parents are.


81 posted on 01/17/2006 9:24:40 AM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dbehsman

I don't have the time to list them all, but let's note that the Fourth Amendment secures our persons, papers, and PROPERTY against any search carried out without judicial fiat. Under the buncom Patriot Act, the judicial fiat is carried out after the fact, and the storm troopers can ram their way into your house any time they like. (Oh, but they wouldn't do it to you. History shows unthinking people assume "it'll never happen to me," until it does.)

Only a shill for corporate America would keep our borders wide open in time of war in order to assure the business class of a massive supply of cheap labor to undercut Americans.

I can go on but you used bold type, which means you are fleeing from cognitive dissonance, and wouldn't listen anyway.


82 posted on 01/17/2006 9:26:14 AM PST by warchild9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

Alan is entertaining; that's my only support of his candidacy. If I wanted to back a winner for winning's sake, I'd have supported Clinton, who destroyed his Republican challengers.


83 posted on 01/17/2006 9:27:26 AM PST by warchild9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
See #3

*sigh*

84 posted on 01/17/2006 9:28:19 AM PST by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: warchild9
Most of the Republicans I know here in NC (and I'm now officially an Independent) are planning on sitting out this election in protest.

In our house, we're backing Alan Keyes, again.

Great, more votes toward making Hillary our - and our troops' - Commander in Chief in 2008... :-(

She thanks you in advance... just as her husband thanked the Perot voters.

85 posted on 01/17/2006 9:33:31 AM PST by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: warchild9

So you have a soft spot for traitors? The exact kind Washington warned about in the Farewell Address.


86 posted on 01/17/2006 9:34:20 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: warchild9; nutmeg
Most of the Republicans I know here in NC (and I'm now officially an Independent) are planning on sitting out this election in protest.

You need to get out more; not one Republican I know is sitting this one out.

McCain or Guiliani are the only ones who'd bring them up away from their television sets.

I can see what part of your problem is; your GOP 'friends' are fools; the rest of us aren't.

I can tell how serious you are about your country by the fact that you are about to support a man who won't even be on the ticket. DUH.

87 posted on 01/17/2006 9:34:41 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: warchild9
Alan is entertaining

Mainly to the Democrats, who can count on more votes and more money every time he opens his mouth.

88 posted on 01/17/2006 9:35:05 AM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: warchild9
A victory by someone with an "R" after their name doesn't imply a "win" for me.

Righ t; a win for you is "voting" for a candidate who won't even be on the ballot..........LOL.

89 posted on 01/17/2006 9:36:08 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: warchild9
But as for the actual effects on my life? Will my rights increase instead of decrease?
What rights do you think are decreasing?

Will my taxes go down?
Your taxes did go down in 2001. Do you remember that famous Hillary comment after 9-11 about wondering if the country would be able to afford those "massive" tax cuts?

Will someone finally hunt down and kill Osama?
Your starting to sound just like someone from the DNC. What do you think Bush has been doing all this time?

Will we finally confront China and stop selling out the country?
What do your propose?

Will we treat the War on Terror as a real war and seal the borders?
Fair enough. Bush thinks that borders should be open. I think he has always thought this. It's an honest disagreement.

If you plan on trolling around on FreeRepublic to try to get a split going among the Republicans, you should really watch how you word things. Your sounding like Nancy Pelosi.
What I don't understand why if the process is broken and you just going to quit the process entirely, do you think then that you have to announce it publicly. It doesn't sound to me like your THAT disgusted. I think it's very interesting that a troll has hijacked a thread about Condi Rice running for president. I think that idea must really scare you and all of your buddies at DU, right?; )
90 posted on 01/17/2006 9:37:17 AM PST by dbehsman (NRA Life member and loving every minute of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: warchild9
By the way, my daddy was a 30-year Marine, who started his career as an underage grunt at Okinawa.

***************

Good for him. What about you?

91 posted on 01/17/2006 9:38:27 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Columbine; peyton randolph; Wolfstar
I would ask why they are here.

To muck it up for the rest of us; they'll be here all during the elections telling us we're not "real conservatives" and we "don't have any principles.

They get off on it.

92 posted on 01/17/2006 9:39:20 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

Nutmeg, please, how many times will the FR knee jerk and "Hillary will win therefore" pop out of the mouth?

How many times must I repeat my view? Ergo: it won't make a dime's worth of difference who is president. Taxes will continue to rise, the debt will continue to rise, Mexicans will continue to invade, COMMUNIST China will continue to buy us, the same people will continue to economically rape the Middle Class ( I include the AARP and others of that sort in that classification) while Osama giggles and gesticulates and waggles his beard at the whole mess.

Reagan is dead, and the system will never let someone like Ron Paul rise to a higher level. I quit. So have a lot of others. No insults or threats of "Hillary" will change reality.


93 posted on 01/17/2006 9:39:24 AM PST by warchild9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: warchild9
First, what do you hope the protest will accomplish?

Second, are you saying that most would support McCain or Guiliani, or that they would be against them?

I just want to make sure I understand the nature of your comment.

TIA.
94 posted on 01/17/2006 9:39:44 AM PST by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Howlin, old dog, haven't heard from you for a while. And still mouthing emptinesses, I see.


95 posted on 01/17/2006 9:40:19 AM PST by warchild9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: warchild9
In the meantime, I'll sit back and watch the show.

Then shut up and let us take care of the country.

96 posted on 01/17/2006 9:40:38 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ladiesview61

I'm with you on that! I hope she gets to do what SHE wants to do. Not what we want her to do.


97 posted on 01/17/2006 9:40:58 AM PST by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: warchild9

You are a useless poster; irrelvant to the point of hilarity.


98 posted on 01/17/2006 9:41:19 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: dbehsman

It takes a while for a certain type to be attracted to a thread and bring it down several levels intellectually. This thread started out pretty well.

Troll...DU...

I joined an exodus of old-timers from FR a few months back back because it was being taken over by individuals who were, shall we say, intellectually inferior. I came back briefly to see if all the jokes over the internet about FR were wrong.

They're not.


99 posted on 01/17/2006 9:43:43 AM PST by warchild9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: warchild9
In our house, we're backing Alan Keyes, again.

Please man what kind of loser fantasy are you having? Did you sleep throught he IL election last cycle? After seeing Keyes lose so badly do you honestly think that he could place anywhere but last in a Republican primary? Time to buy a clue.

100 posted on 01/17/2006 9:44:40 AM PST by Melas (What!? Read or learn something? Why would anyone do that, when they can just go on being stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 461 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson