The ruling didn't touch on state's rights. Instead, in touched on John Ashcraft.
"Congress did not have this far-reaching intent to alter the federal-state balance.".......Justice Anthony M. Kennedy
"....attempt to regulate general medical practices historically entrusted to state lawmakers"......9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
What article or amendment to the Constitution takes the regulation of medicine within in a state out of state hands and puts it in the hands of the Federal Government?
None.
That is exactly the reason why Roe v. Wade is a ruling without a constitutiuonal basis.