http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/17jan20061050/www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05pdf/04-623.pdf
Way at the bottom...
"...The relevance of such considerations was at its zenith in Raich when we considered whether the CSA could be applied to the intrastate possession of a controlled substance consistent with the limited federal powers enumerated by the Constitution. Such considerations have little, if any, relevance where, as here, were are merely presented with a question of statutory interpretation and not the extent of constitutionally permissible federal power. This is particularly true where, as here, we are interpreting broad, straightforward language, within a statutory framework that a majority of this Court has concluded is so comprehensive that it necessarily nullifies the States' "traditional...powers...to protect the health, safety, and welfare of their citizens....The court's reliance upon the constitutional principles that it rejected in Raich -- albeit under the guise of statutory interpretation -- is perplexing to say the least. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent."