Posted on 01/17/2006 7:01:28 AM PST by Paul Ross
Didn't know that makes someone 'far right'.
That being said, it is truly sad that there appears to be anti-semitism as part of the the 'culinary' protest statement being made.
A ham sandwich. The horror. The horror.
Not nice? Yup.
Criminal? Only in a totalitarian regime.
1. I thought there were no hungry people in Europe.
2. This is religious discrimination, not racism. I get so tired of people conflating the two.
You mean they didn't want to feed the scumbags that had burned their way through their country? You're kidding!
LOL...The 'FAR' right does not believe in charity...
The far right believes that if you can't hack it...you should just go away and die.
This is simply another attempt by the far left to pit Muslims against the free west they so dispise and are bent on destroying ...Muslims are their brown shirts...
imo
Mmmm...ham. Somebody post the Homer slobbering pic.
Truly hungery people would eat earthworms if it was properly prepared....
"it is truly sad that there appears to be anti-semitism as part of the the 'culinary' protest statement being made."
But the French government is no worried about that. They are only worried about INNOCENT peoples' rights.
A college buddy of mine who was in the ROTC had to eat live earthworms once. He said the taste wasn't that bad, that you could almost imagine it like spaghetti except for the wriggling.
While I wholeheartedly agree and could personally not give a damn if they like it or not...
The group's head, Dominique Lescure, said pork was a traditional part of French cuisine. He did admit, however, wanting to serve the soup to his "compatriots and European homeless people".
The philosophy behind Soulidarieta, which means solidarity in the local dialect, is made clear in the association's literature, in which it claims: "Our people face being submerged by a rising black demographic tide," and announces "the launch of a voluntary social and political action in favour of our most deprived blood brothers".
The group's slogans call for "solidarity with our European brothers", and "Our own kind first before others".
They did kinda ask for the response they got. Some things while widely known are better left unsaid, even if that's your whole purpose.
This is in contrast to Muslim charities, which subsidize suicide bombers' families.
Look, the muzzies don't want to eat the free food, they don't have to. Muslim charity only goes to muslims, why can't this group decide to be selective and give charity to the people they want to serve?
Sheesh, though ... if person is making the effort of trying to feed a lot of people, pork is going to give you a lot of meat for the dollar.
This is insane. So if a while male, such as myself, were not allowed to stay in a women and children's shelter, or weren't allowed to participate in a racial college fund, the leaders of those organization and the specific employees that barred my admission should be arrested? At least these people are feeding someone who can't feed themselves.
If the people protesting the soup kitchen put their efforts into preparing food especially for Muslims and Jews instead of just standing around with signs, then more people would get fed.
It's nonsense that people can't see that this is a good deed, however politically charged, just because it doesn't provide the same good to every person.
The Jews won't complain. They'll just take care of their own.
And why haven't we heard from the vegetarians?
All right, a Jew did complain. I guess he represents their equivalent of the ADL.
Or even if they're not.
The people doing this are doing it to cause trouble, not to help the poor. They're using the poor as props.
Slimy, yet satisfying.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.