To: The Ghost of FReepers Past; ohioWfan; Tribune7; Tolkien; GrandEagle; Right in Wisconsin; Dataman; ..
Even though ID relies not at all on the Bible, it does leave open the conclusion that the designer is the biblical God and this implication of God is what the Darwinists seem to fear.
Revelation 4:11Intelligent Design
See my profile for info
411 posted on
01/17/2006 6:04:41 AM PST by
wallcrawlr
(http://www.bionicear.com/)
To: wallcrawlr
Even though ID relies not at all on the Bible, it does leave open the conclusion that the designer is the biblical God and this implication of God is what the Darwinists seem to fear.Oddly enough, there is no theory or hypothesis in science that closes the door on belief in a creator God. Evolution, like everything else in science, is the best available description of how things work. It does not describe how or why existence came to be.
The problem with ID is that it does not attempt to describe how things work. It has no theories or hypotheses that would suggest research. It does no research. It proposes no research.
416 posted on
01/17/2006 6:12:15 AM PST by
js1138
(Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
To: wallcrawlr
And there at the core of it all lies the seething ******.
Thats why no matter how many times 'the evidence' must be re calibrated the conclusion remains the same.
430 posted on
01/17/2006 6:51:42 AM PST by
RunningWolf
(Vet US Army Air Cav 1975)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson