Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: King Prout
you proposed a conclusion that the statement would be useless.

And I told you why. Logic does not require a null hypothesis. Your "premise" is false. Letters do not self-replicate.

225 posted on 01/16/2006 10:03:20 PM PST by AndrewC (Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]


To: AndrewC

nice dodge. total lie on your part. typical.

I stated: "if letters imperfectly self-replicated, 'every letter is a transitional sentence' would be quite factual."

You replied: "and STILL be useless."

STILL is the key word. In your application, it means, denotation, literal: "even under those specific conditions you set forth"

you are too clever an irritant to not know this.
you are, thus, engaged in willful and deliberate falsehood and self-aggrandizement.

go 'way, blowfly. shoo.


239 posted on 01/16/2006 10:11:24 PM PST by King Prout (many accuse me of being overly literal... this would not be a problem if many were not under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson