Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tailgunner Joe
Darwinists must be an endangered species. How else to explain their 80-year need for court protection to ensure their survival?

Aside: Will someone please post the "aw, geez, not this s--- again" pic so I can bookmark it?

This is akin to the kid who kills his parents and then pleads for mercy on the grounds that he is an orphan. Evolution is deemed to lean on "court protection" because it has stood up to a torrent of litigation and legislation in an effort to make it go away.

Among scientists, "Darwinism" is no more controversial than Euclidism or Copernicism or Pasteurism. The controversy is not a scientific controversy; it's a political controversy over whether or not science should be taught.

115 posted on 01/16/2006 9:22:06 PM PST by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ReignOfError

"Among scientists, "Darwinism" is no more controversial than Euclidism or Copernicism or Pasteurism"

So they have resolved the conflict between gradualism (Darwin's concept) and punctuated equilibrium (Gould's theory)?


144 posted on 01/16/2006 9:31:49 PM PST by fizziwig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson