[conservatism_IS_compassion]

Two people were fighting over the proceeds from Vanguard. It could have been any company on earth.

The two claimed and one was awarded the shares.

IT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE COMPANY AT ALL BUT WHO WOULD INHERIT.

If indeed that is the case, it was recusing himself after the fact that created the whole flapdoodle. Walking the second mile that way merely sets you up for the bushwhackers.

[OldFriend]

It's the case......and he did more than was required even adding in the appearance. THERE WAS NO APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY.

The person appealed on the grounds that the Judge had Vanguard stock so he felt it was best to have the case retried by another panel. The second panel voted unanimously in the same manner that Judge Alito had decided.

[Robert A Cook PE]

So, what are YOU going to be doing in front of a Congressional Hearing under oath in 15 years?

How could he have foreseen the demo's obscene attack tactics in a Senate SC Inquisition when this case came up? HE was (personally) attacked by the defendant, said "OKO. Fine. I'll recuse myself, we'll start over ..."

And the result was unanimous AGAIN, against the same defendant.