Pat is "an independent thinker"?
You have some real problems, there, ducky. Pat is about as "original" as the white supremacists are and he isn't "right" 85% of the time, either. Just because YOU agree with Pat 85% of the time, that doesn't make Pat and you correct!
What you said, ducky, is that the N.Y. Times keeps Pat's books off their best sellers' lists; which they do not! Now, you are changing the story, to reviews and publicity. No wonder you imagine that Pat writes cogently! LOL
Sheeeeeeeeeesh...the N.Y. Times Sunday Book Review section can't "lie" about which books are in the top ten! That would be easy to dispute, with sale figures.
And since many people, like me, don't buy books on line, but in book stores, Amazon's lists don't indicate an absolutely correct sale of books.
And no, they don't land on the N.Y.Times top ten list; not in hard cover nor paperback, anymore.
Why the qualifier?
Amazon's lists don't indicate an absolutely correct sale of books.
Another qualifier? But based on the sample size of Amazon, it can't be sneezed at. The N.Y.Times on the other hand relies on shady Publishers and soliciting Book Stores who benefit from the hype.
Either way you cut it, Pat sold a pile of books, with enough articles and transcripts for more.
I'll bet even you, prolific reader, has read his books. I suppose there are more successful non fiction writers. Could you name a few?
Pat is more dangerous now than Michael Moore. Because he is respected and followed by too many conservatives. Pat is an apologist for our enemies in the Islamic world.