Skip to comments.
Pat Buchanan: Might the Arabs Have a Point?
The American Conservative ^
| 16 January 2006
| Patrick J. Buchanan
Posted on 01/16/2006 1:26:24 PM PST by Hal1950
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240 ... 341-355 next last
To: Howlin
They come out of the woodwork for election, Buchanan and the Jeeeeews.
201
posted on
01/16/2006 3:24:08 PM PST
by
Peach
To: Howlin; Peach; Darksheare; spoolmak
I notice that he spool-boy has since gone quiet with his support of Buchanan.
I wonder what his screen name was the last time he was here :-)
To: MikeinIraq
I was just wondering who he was "before". LOL
203
posted on
01/16/2006 3:26:43 PM PST
by
Peach
To: MikeinIraq
For all we know, Spool-Boy is posting from The American Conservative. It could be a generic log in.
204
posted on
01/16/2006 3:29:58 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: spoolmak
You mean arab terrorists.
There is no such thing as a Palestinian.
205
posted on
01/16/2006 3:30:36 PM PST
by
Darksheare
(Tagline subverted for nefarious plans of nefariousness.)
To: Howlin
yes that is very possible...
IT could be Pat himself, although I kinda doubt that Pat would be able to articulate any supporting thoughts without outing himself altogether....
To: MikeinIraq; Howlin; Peach
His post 200 is interesting, considering there is no such thing as a Palestinian.
I also wonder what his previous handle was.
207
posted on
01/16/2006 3:31:23 PM PST
by
Darksheare
(Tagline subverted for nefarious plans of nefariousness.)
To: spoolmak
To answer your question, one example - the UN resolution that "Sharon & Co" have "stomped on" most glaringly is UN resolution 194, otherwise known as right of return - for Palestinian refugees.
And the funny part is, most of those "refugees" are card-carrying Hamas members.....
To: Hal1950
Who cares what Arabs think.
Then again, who cares what ANY Middle Eastern thinks.
209
posted on
01/16/2006 3:32:01 PM PST
by
Windsong
(Jesus Saves, but Buddha makes incremental backups)
To: Darksheare
Off topic:
Brit Hume just mentioned the magazine piece Kennedy read at last week's Alito hearing was satire. Let's hope some senators bring that up this week. In front of Kennedy :-)
210
posted on
01/16/2006 3:33:19 PM PST
by
Peach
To: spoolmak
I have no objection to many of Pat's arguments. I agree with him on illegal immigration and the causes of the death of the west. However, I totally disagree with him when he uses the bully pupit he has for some anti semitic tirade. He delegitimizes the valid points he makes on some issues by coming off as some lunatic on others. By doing that he does a disservice to the conservative movement when those who support more illegal immigartion point to him as a supporter. As conservatives we need to do everything we can to distance ourselves from the lunatic babblings he comes out with. He no more belongs in mainstream conservatism than does David Duke.
211
posted on
01/16/2006 3:33:46 PM PST
by
Cacique
(quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
To: Hal1950; All
Pat Buchanan is the Al Gore of the right!
To: spoolmak
To answer your question, one example - the UN resolution that "Sharon & Co" have "stomped on" most glaringly is UN resolution 194, otherwise known as right of return - for Palestinian refugees.You need to just stop now; nobody on THIS web site agrees with "right of return."
And there is NO SUCH thing as right of return to a country that NEVER EXISTED.
213
posted on
01/16/2006 3:36:29 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: AmericaUnited
"Al GorePat Buchanan's incessant need to insert himself in the headline of the day is almost as glaring as his lack of understanding of the threats facing America," Tracey Schmitt, spokeswoman for the Republican National Committee, said in a statement.
To: Darksheare; MikeinIraq
As long as I"ve been here, I'm NEVER seen anybody in favor of right of return.
215
posted on
01/16/2006 3:37:20 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: Darksheare
Sorry, no previous handle, and no, I'm not Pat...I've just been an admirer of his for some time, mostly based on his hard-line opposition to abortion and his America-first patriotic views. Let's please not reduce criticism of my posts to now calling me an anti-semite. I thought forums were a place to discuss things, but if you all want to just keep agreeing with each other and bashing anyone who shows up with a different take, so be it.
To: Wolfstar
The nuns where I went to school were tough, no nonsense, maybe mean (from a child's and teenager's perspective). But they did not teach hate. Period. Sounds like we went to the same kind of school
Though .. I do have to admit that I'm trying very hard not to hate the Clinton's and what they've done to further their careers at the expense of not just the American people .. but those around the world
217
posted on
01/16/2006 3:39:41 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
To: spoolmak
There IS NO Palestine...that is why you have no credibility.
218
posted on
01/16/2006 3:40:03 PM PST
by
Txsleuth
(Thank you to all that donated on the Freepathon...next time more monthlies!!)
To: spoolmak
If you could discuss things without resorting to things that aren't true, people wouldn't bash you.
219
posted on
01/16/2006 3:41:09 PM PST
by
Peach
To: spoolmak
I'm not Pat... Well of course not Pat. Everyone understands you use a pseudo when on forums like this. How's the Benz running?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240 ... 341-355 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson