Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: orionblamblam
I'm not makign that arguement. I'm simply pointing out that this technology is not a panacea, and has definite limitations. It is, for example, *worthless* for quick-response systems or military applications and the transportation of heavy items.

I never proposed that it could be used for quick-response systems. However, it is far more efficient at moving heavy objects to orbit to include weapons platforms for the military.

106 posted on 01/17/2006 1:12:18 PM PST by Spiff ("They start yelling, 'Murderer!' 'Traitor!' They call me by name." - Gael Murphy, Code Pink leader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]


To: Spiff

> I never proposed that it could be used for quick-response systems.

Then if you want to do away with rockets... what exactly were you planning on using?

> it is far more efficient at moving heavy objects to orbit to include weapons platforms for the military.

Incorrect. The payloads that an elevator will be able to carry will be fairly small, at least for the foreseeable future.


108 posted on 01/17/2006 1:15:00 PM PST by orionblamblam (A furore Normannorum libra nos, Domine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson