Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah
hmm... let me see:

How about the fourth amendment (I keep forgetting - the constitution only matters when it is convenient)

Or how about the National Security Act of 1947.

Sorry - you are right - these are just minor inconveniences - let's make sure we give up our liberties in the hope that it provides security.
76 posted on 01/16/2006 7:23:18 PM PST by al_again
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: al_again
The 4th Amendment states: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Since when has AlQaida bothered with getting a warrant to mess with the people in this country?

BTW, you are "secure" against only UNREASONABLE searches, et al.

So, what's UNREASONABLE about chasing the enemy to ground in wartime?

I'd be more than happy to participate, gratis, and without even working as a government agent.

84 posted on 01/16/2006 7:40:32 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

To: al_again

Now, regarding "liberties" that are given up, that hasn't happened. I do hope AlQaida and their running dog lackeys have given up their "liberties" and their lives as we defend ourselves against their attacks.


85 posted on 01/16/2006 7:41:34 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson