Comment 2: Today Sudafed; tomorrow baking soda? What is the legal precedent for requiring signatures for purchase of any product?
Comment 3: What is the legal precedent for limiting the quantity you can buy of ANY product? Will ammo be limited next? Cigarettes?
Roy Cooper going to do PSAs about how much safer our state is now because meth chemists can't buy psuedofed?
I just went on Drugstore.com and apparently you can buy as much Sudafed as you want on there
Now that you have ranted, do you have any realistic recommendations?
Actually, your question two "What is the legal precedent fo requiring signature?" is the 1968 U.S. law on firearms that required a signature and ID to purchase pistol and revolver ammunition.
"and only three packages in a 30-day period."
Is there going to be a statewide database that prohibits you from going to another store to buy the stuff?
Is the local DA going to prosecute someone who is over their limit for the month, needs the medicine, tosses a $10 to the cashier and walks out of the store with the product?
What took you people so long? In Wisconsin, we've had to do this for months now. What a joke.
And I will be filing a suitcase with sudafed every time I leave the state.
They haven't instituted customs controls at the borders. . . yet.
Winter or summer we will just build up a stash in the freezer to get us through the bad weather.
More liberties surrendered to keep people from getting high. And this will be as successful as every other measure taken in the failed war on some drugs.
I think this is good in the long run. Stupid laws like this will turn more and more people against the War on Some Drugs. Please keep passing these idiotic laws!
bump
a.r.o.o