Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Melas
I'm hoping you have some point

The point is to tell you that it is false to believe that an expensive bike will never fail (your words). Quote: "the difference is that I can count on my bikes to not fail me." A more expensive bike may be less likely to fail than a cheap one when used hard, but expensive ones fail too.

251 posted on 01/17/2006 10:44:24 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies ]


To: FreedomCalls
A more expensive bike may be less likely to fail than a cheap one when used hard, but expensive ones fail too.

I didn't expect anyone to adopt an overly literal reading of my "the difference is that I can count on my bikes to not fail me." and read into it a testament of absolute infallibility. Everything has a potential for failure, but if you have to be rear ended at a light, the smart money is on being in the Volvo and not the Pinto. Likewise, I've diminished the possibility of equipment failure as much as I can by buying quality equipment. It can still fail, but it's not very likely. Quite the contrary for department store bikes, failure under heavy use is expected.

252 posted on 01/17/2006 10:50:27 PM PST by Melas (What!? Read or learn something? Why would anyone do that, when they can just go on being stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson