I am disgusted enough with what has been done to our rights since the founding of this country to recognize that in all reality we now have virtually no rights at all, enumerated or not!
We now have only those limited rights we can afford to defend in court, our own wallet against the Gov. Org.'s unlimited funds.
The continuing dismissal of our rights, enumerated or not, as being merely "policy", subject to denial or reinterpretation at Gov. whim, is beyond contempt!
"Judges" engaging in judicial activism and spouting personal ideology to support their treasonous attacks on our liberties may succeed in reducing our rights to nothing, but that does not make them right.
People idly talk about the fall of our republic, overbearing Gov. breaking faith with it's own basic tenets is the most likely source of that fall.
Denying that U.S. Citizens have a right to privacy is certainly a concrete step toward the totalitarianism that will eventually destroy this country.
This also explains why so many in Gov. are working so hard to reinterpret our RKBA in a manner to diminish and destroy it.
But oddly enough, you've been taking the position on this thread consistent with judicial activism. In finding that right to privacy listed nowhere in the Constitution, the judges were able to use it to say that states can't prohibit abortion.
There's nothing preventing them from a new constitutional right for you. Let's call it the constitutional right to safety.
They can then use that right to impose a duty on the state to do something in order to protect you. Pick your poison, mandatory identification requirements, travel restrictions, whatever they want.
THAT's what's dangerous about finding new constitutional rights for you. They're used in efforts to take away your other rights.