Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy
Hawkins H. Nunn vs. The State of Georgia.

"We are of the opinion, then, that so far as the act of 1837 seeks to suppress the practice of carrying certain weapons secretly, that it is valid, inasmuch as it does not deprive the citizen of his natural right of self-defence..." --Hawkins H. Nunn vs. The State of Georgia.

556 posted on 01/18/2006 5:10:18 PM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 549 | View Replies ]


To: Mojave
"We are of the opinion, then, that so far as the act of 1837 seeks to suppress the practice of carrying certain weapons secretly, that it is valid, inasmuch as it does not deprive the citizen of his natural right of self-defence..." --Hawkins H. Nunn vs. The State of Georgia.

And that was contingent on the fact that open carry was still allowed.

Try another cherry-pick, weasel-boy.

559 posted on 01/18/2006 5:12:20 PM PST by dirtboy (My new years resolution is to quit using taglines...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 556 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson