Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwalsh07
In the preceeding paragraph, Judge Lumpkin states:

"I am aware that it has been decided, that this, like other amendments adopted at the same time, is a restriction upon the government of the United States, and does not extend to the individual States."

You left that out.

551 posted on 01/18/2006 5:03:47 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 515 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen

preceding


554 posted on 01/18/2006 5:07:15 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 551 | View Replies ]

To: robertpaulsen

I left nothing out pal. I linked to the holding. Your side is the side that left out all the cases that dispute the notion that the people willingly ceded their rights to the state. And there are many more. But the kicker is that once the people found out they had been defrauded by the likes of Marshall and his ilk, they righted that ship quick thanks to folks like Justice Lumpkin and Justice Spencer who allowed the sunlight to shine on the statists.


555 posted on 01/18/2006 5:09:32 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 551 | View Replies ]

To: robertpaulsen
"I am aware that it has been decided, that this, like other amendments adopted at the same time, is a restriction upon the government of the United States, and does not extend to the individual States."

Yep. And he'll leave it out again the next time he trots it out.

558 posted on 01/18/2006 5:12:17 PM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 551 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson