To: jwalsh07
"We are of the opinion, then, that so far as the act of 1837 seeks to suppress the practice of carrying certain weapons secretly, that it is valid, inasmuch as it does not deprive the citizen of his natural right of self-defence..." --Judge Lumpkin
Judge Lumpkin, a state court judge, argued without source or cite that the 2nd Amendment could be applied to the state of Georgia and that it permitted a ban on concealed weapons. And you support the bizarre notion that a national banned on concealable weapons would be Constitutional.
You're Sarah Brady's wet dream.
547 posted on
01/18/2006 4:48:39 PM PST by
Mojave
To: Mojave
Judge Lumpkin, a state court judge, argued without source or cite that the 2nd Amendment could be applied to the state of Georgia and that it permitted a ban on concealed weapons.Boy, you are a weasel, aren't you?
To Lumpkin, a ban on concealed weapons was OK if open carry of weapons was allowed.
Do you think the Brady types would go for national open carry?
More dishonesty from you, Mojave. I'd take unlimited open carry any day of the week.
548 posted on
01/18/2006 4:54:47 PM PST by
dirtboy
(My new years resolution is to quit using taglines...)
To: Mojave
549 posted on
01/18/2006 4:57:57 PM PST by
dirtboy
(My new years resolution is to quit using taglines...)
To: Mojave
Now you're simply lying. When you start to lie, you lose.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson