Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: IronJack
The Ninth Amendment principle, that enumerated rights in the Constitution do not disparage other rights retainged by the people

The Ninth Amendment was meant as a constriant on federal power - not as a justification for expanding such. If the Ninth and the Tenth are treated as a tandem, as they should be, abortion should have remained a matter for the states. Only by taking an activist view of the Ninth, as happened with Griswold, can such a view be used to supercede both state laws and the Tenth.

124 posted on 01/15/2006 3:03:23 PM PST by dirtboy (My new years resolution is to quit using taglines...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy
Griswold did nothing to create any additional federal powers. It ruled that since the right to privacy was not an enumerated right under the Constitution, it was reserved to The People, and that, as such, no state had the right to restrict it. It NEGATED a state "right," but did not create any new federal power.

The right to privacy became, in effect, a federally protected constitutional right by virtue of the Ninth Amendment and emanations proceeding from several others. The Court does not address any Tenth Amendment concerns in Griswold, and I don't know that any were ever raised.

137 posted on 01/15/2006 3:25:33 PM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson